The One Hour Screenwriter eCourse
January 18, 2014 – 10:34 AM | 2 Comments

GET TO THE HEART OF THE STORY®

This comprehensive course breaks the screenwriting process down into simple steps that can be accomplished in just one hour a day. You will never be stuck or stymied again. Finally finish your screenplay!

Read the full story »
In the News

Film, television and web entertainment news from around the cool.

Movies

My film reviews and how the Nine Character Types affects the success or failure of the script.

Television

What’s on TV? How the right Character Types help make a hit or miss.

Writing Tips

Making the writing life work for you. Tips and tricks to keep your writing fresh and interesting.

Musings

Random thoughts on pop culture and the world at large.

Home » Movies

Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close

Submitted by on February 21, 2012 – 4:02 PMNo Comment

BOY-ACADEMY32Some books just don’t make good movies, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close is a prime example.  I read the book and loved it. The book was too dense and complex to make a satisfying movie adaptation.  A prime example is the appearance of The Renter (Max von Syndow).  He is a confusing character in the film but plays a large and richly detailed role in the novel.

David Denby writing in The New Yorker puts his finger on another problem:

The boy’s voice, as Foer creates it, is a babbling brook of hopes and questions and bits of information on every imaginable subject. In the novel, we can enjoy all of this heroic spieling and exploring as a form of antic play. It never occurs to us that an actual little boy, however bright, however maddened by grief, could talk this way. Oskar’s voice is a writer’s virtuoso construction, and Foer combines it with the voice of Oskar’s grandfather, photographs of falling bodies, odd dialogues, lists of numbers, garbled paragraphs, nearly blank pages, and many other typographical adventures. The novel is a kind of postmodernist collage stained with tear.
Much of what Oskar says in the book is amusingly beside the point. Onscreen, however, the sound of a hyper-articulate boy talking semi-nonsense becomes very hard to take.

The boy’s voice, as (author Jonathan Safran) Foer creates it, is a babbling brook of hopes and questions and bits of information on every imaginable subject. In the novel, we can enjoy all of this heroic spieling and exploring as a form of antic play. It never occurs to us that an actual little boy, however bright, however maddened by grief, could talk this way. Oskar’s voice is a writer’s virtuoso construction, and Foer combines it with the voice of Oskar’s grandfather, photographs of falling bodies, odd dialogues, lists of numbers, garbled paragraphs, nearly blank pages, and many other typographical adventures. The novel is a kind of postmodernist collage stained with tear… Much of what Oskar says in the book is amusingly beside the point. Onscreen, however, the sound of a hyper-articulate boy talking semi-nonsense becomes very hard to take.

I agree.  The “voices” in the book did not translate well into film, which is way too literal to capture the author’s delicacy, humor, and fantastical imagination.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.